The Google search engine has revolutionised the way we search for information. In the past, to search for information regarding a particular topic, we had to take a trip down to the nearest library, sift through stacks of books to find potential information. Once we found the book of our interest, we need to sift through the book again to find probably the small paragraph relevant to whatever we are researching about.
Then the internet and search engines turn it into a much more convenient process, where you type keywords into the search engine, and at the press of a button, you are directed to a wealth of information, not limited to the scope of books found at the library, but all over the world. The information is vast and the process is convinient, changing the whole way things used to be. Now there are E-books online, which is the the book itself online, similar or completely the same as the actual book that you can find in hardcopy at the library. It has become a sort of Googlary, a library at your fingertips.
The library has seem to have lost its purpose, but this I do not agree to. The library is still a convenient, conducive place to study and do research at. Currently not all books found in the library are online, thus the library still has a wealth of information the internet cannot yet wholly replicate online. I believe that these two (Library and Googlary) should coexist as they compliment each other, providing a good platform for research to be conducted. The library is also no doubt a place of memories for many, and should not be replaced just like that.
Thus. in conclusion, i do agree that the internet and search engines are to an extent, "taking over" what the library used to be for, but this is not wholly so, because even though it might have the potential to replicate the library's technical aspects, it cannot replicate asethetic aspects, thus the library and "googlary" should and must coexist and complement each other to ensure a healthy balance